Loading LiveCycle Banners.
  1. News Articles
  2. Related News Articles
  3. Comments (2)
News Article Details

Study: Pollution Costs Underestimated

Source: UPI Science News

Back | A- | A+
 Email This     Print     Subscribe

Posted on 18 Sep 2012 by Neilson

Pollution costs underestimatedUsing a faulty analytical model has led the U.S. federal government to significantly underestimate the costs of carbon pollution, a study suggests.

Writing in the Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, researchers said the model used by the government is incomplete because it all but ignores the economic damages climate change will inflict on future generations.

Without properly accounting for pollution costs, natural gas appears to be the cheapest generation option for new power plants, but that's a faulty assumption, the study authors said.

"It turns out that the price we now pay for energy is much higher than what shows up on our electric bills or the tab at the gas pump," Laurie Johnson, chief economist in the climate and clean air program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said.

Considering the economic costs of carbon and other pollutants from fossil fuel generation, the researchers said, building new electricity generation capacity using wind and solar power would be more cost effective than either natural gas or coal.

"With approximately 40 percent of all carbon emissions in the United States coming from power plants, the economic advantages of clean electricity sources are significant," Johnson said.


Mike Pugaczewski  Sep 18 2012 12:28PM Report Abuse
If any one believes this, I have a bridge for sale!
Mike Pugaczewski  Sep 18 2012 12:26PM Report Abuse
If any one believes this, I have a bridge for sale?
Post a Comment
If you are a Storefront / Tradingfloor user, click here to login.
Note: As a guest user, please fill out the form below to post a comment.
Post your comments here.
Name :
Email Address :
Captcha :
Comments :
Character left : 2000