Posted on 01 Apr 2010
Reinsurance rates across most lines of property catastrophe business around the world continued the
decline experienced at January 1, 2010, according to Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC, the leading
global risk and reinsurance specialist, in its annual report released today on reinsurance market
conditions at the April 1 renewals period.
The report, April 1 Reinsurance Renewals: Rates Lower; Returns Under Pressure, covers regional
developments as well as key issues and trends.
Highlights from the report include:
• Rates at the April 1 renewal showed a declining trend in most classes. Specific changes varied
by line of business, and there were occasional exceptions on problematic lines, such as marine
hull proportional treaties.
• Total capacity sought by buyers for their major catastrophe exposures was similar to the
expiring year, with reductions by some cedents and increases by others.
• The effect of the Chilean earthquake was limited, though it is possible that timing may have
played a part, as many of the major placements were quoted, priced and, in some cases,
completed before the effects of this loss could be fully realized.
• Overall, the renewal in Japan was smooth and perhaps easier for buyers than in many previous
years, reflecting a generally softer market. With few major issues or changes to terms and
conditions, renewals were completed within similar timetables as compared to prior years.
US PROPERTY CATASTROPHE
• Pricing for U.S. property catastrophe reinsurance at April 1 saw the continuation of the
decreasing pricing trend in evidence at January 1. Capacity continued to be plentiful – a critical
element in companies’ ability to secure favorable terms and conditions. Individual renewals
vary significantly, based on each company’s own experience and positioning.
• U.S. catastrophe pricing for nationwide companies decreased 8 percent when not factoring in
the impact of the catastrophe model changes, and by 13 percent on average when adjusted for
• Although not a significant source of April 1 renewals, the Latin American region provides an
early indication of the implications of the Chilean earthquake for pricing and terms and
conditions. Preliminary estimates of the aggregate loss arising from the earthquake vary widely.
The market may continue to evolve going into the July 1 renewals. Overall terms and conditions
in the region as a whole appear to be only modestly affected and, in some cases, unchanged by
the earthquake. However, pricing varies by country.
REPUBLIC OF KOREA
• In the property catastrophe segment, price changes ranged from decreases of 7.5 percent
to increases of 2.5 percent, reflecting the variety of changes and experiences that included
increased aggregates, deductibles and, in some cases, limits.
• Korea’s property risk segment was affected by the Samsung loss of late March 2009, which
occurred too late to be reflected in the April 1, 2009 renewal. There was a second large loss
in November 2009. Both losses were factored into the April 1, 2010 renewal, and loss
affected treaties sustained increases of 10 to 15 percent. For loss-free treaties, rates were
down by 5 to 10 percent.
• Pricing was down by 10 to 20 percent in the liability market. Loss experience has been light,
making the business more attractive to underwriters.
“The April 1, 2010 reinsurance renewals are dominated by Asia, but were conducted with one eye on
the catastrophes that occurred elsewhere in the world. Reinsurance rates in most cases declined,
continuing the pattern observed at the January 1, 2010 renewals, which occurred largely due to the
effects of healthier (re)insurer balance sheets. The large earthquake in Chile and, to a lesser extent, windstorm Xynthia in Europe, both striking in the first quarter of 2010, caused pause for thought," says Chris Klein, Global Head of Business Intelligence, Guy Carpenter.
“There are several significant renewals at April 1 in the U.S. that did not show signs of impact from the recent global loss activity. There was some evidence of price tightening in parts of Latin America. The Chile situation remains uncertain, and earthquake losses generally develop more slowly than wind events. Up to half of catastrophe loss ratio budgets were consumed, causing reduced headroom for a larger catastrophe later in the year. This scenario, along with buoyant balance sheets, lower investment yields and thinner reserve releases, will put pressure on returns - sustaining active capital management and perhaps, in time, stabilizing the market.”